Quote:
Originally Posted by Johannes
... most Sowiet aircraft were known by many different codes i.e Il-2 is also known as Vultee, ZKP-57, V-11 and R-3, are are recorded on the mikrofilms in all these guises!.
|
The Vultee V-11 had nothing to do with the IL-2. 36 were built in the Soviet Union (Andersson pg.260) but failed to be accepted for military use (the R-Zet - a biplane - was chosen instead, the letter "Z" in Russian is is written thus:"3" hence the R-3, still not an IL-2). All 36 V-11s were turned over to Aeroflot in 1939 and used as postal couriers. The R-10 (KhAI-5) had a very similar appearance to the V-11. 490 were built but only 10 were in the west in 1941 in the 46th ORAE as part of the Pinsk Flotilla. Many R-10s had been lost at Khalkin Gol and even in more Finland in 1939-40. The remaining aircraft were in the interior or Far Eastern Military Districts and eventually all were handed over to Aeroflot in 1943 and used as passenger planes, their gun turrets removed. The Su-2 was designed to replace the R-10. I know there were many claims for R-10s, but most of the claims were Su-2s which have a similar appearance. I have matched a lot of R-10 claims to Su-2 units operating in the areas where no R-10s operated. Again I fail to see how these claims correlate to IL-2 losses...IL-2s do not resemble R-10s or Su-2s and up to the fall of 1942 all the IL-2s are single seat aircraft with no rear gunner or turret. last, the design designation for the IL-2 is TsKP-57...the Ts in Russian is pronounced the same as the letter Z in German hence ZKP-57...so, especially at the beginning of the war the Luftwaffe pilots knew a little about the IL-2 before the war, probably from their Military attaches. There never was an IL-5 or IL-7, this is just miss identification. I think the pilots who made these claims knew what they shot down even if they didn't know the proper name for it. What I see are researchers misinterpreting the claims because they are under informed
...See the attachments: