Quote:
Originally Posted by PMoz99
Thanks guys.
So from what you say according to Matti Salonen there is a probability Ju88R-2 4R+RB was associated with Raht, and then maybe/perhaps he could also be associated with Ju88G-1 710510 4R+AB, with the G-1 mistakenly recorded as a G-6 at some point in time?
Peter
|
No, that is just spculating. You need actuaral reference to 710510 with Raht or any G-1 /G-6 mistake. But I can not say more about Ju 88 R-2 one. I think this might be clear case of guessing into circumstances.