Thread: Top Fw 190 aces
View Single Post
  #56  
Old 29th August 2018, 16:48
Nick Beale's Avatar
Nick Beale Nick Beale is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Exeter, England
Posts: 6,341
Nick Beale is a jewel in the roughNick Beale is a jewel in the roughNick Beale is a jewel in the roughNick Beale is a jewel in the rough
Re: Top Fw 190 aces

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfred.MONZAT View Post
Yes the Spitfire V have twice more firepower but the Bf 109 F-4 would fire its 20 mm cannon for three more time (200 rounds vs 60x2 rounds) and its machine guns one third more time (500x2 rounds vs 350x4 rounds). And also engine mounted weapons tends to be much more accurate, a fact that should not be downgraded.
A fair point but is longer firing time better than the ability to deliver a heavier weight of fire quickly, given that much aerial combat was a matter of split-second opportunities? I agree that better accuracy does help because what matters is how many bullets hit the target, not how many you fire.

I think if we are looking at development potential then Fw 190 (Fw 190 A – Fw 190 D – Ta 152 H) showed more than the Bf 109. And the same is true of the Spitfire (Mk I – Mk XIV) and P-51 (A – K) for example.
__________________
Nick Beale
http://www.ghostbombers.com
Reply With Quote