View Single Post
  #65  
Old 8th July 2006, 22:54
Nicholas Nicholas is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Norfolk, England
Posts: 41
Nicholas is on a distinguished road
Re: Australian Spitfires

Quote:
Originally Posted by Six Nifty .50s



British researchers of official RAF book-keeping indicates that many aircraft losses were not recorded properly, or not reported at all. Hundreds of previously uncounted RAF losses were found by cross-checking official records for discrepancies and turning to other sources like pilot log books, army or police reports, postwar interviews, and crash sites examined by aviation archeaologists.

Often the information in various official files does not match. Sometimes an airplane was written off or stricken off charge long after it was destroyed or seriously damaged, making it difficult to determine the cause. Perhaps the Australians can claim more accurate accounting than the British or Japanese air forces, but you'll have to prove it.
Wel, I don't have to prove anything. In fact the points you articulate above reinforce exactly why I'm sceptical about the admitted Japanese losses!

Eight twee .303s
Reply With Quote