Quote:
Originally Posted by Rolfeb
Dear Mr. Bronc,
thanks for your intellegent comment even it doesn't help at all.
First af all, there is a part number on the part which is quite vidsible. The part number is: R8-109.412-0101
. For the specialists in this Forum it is easy to identify. In Addition you can see some fingers at the part. So if the part would have a lenth of 30cm, how big the fingers must be? Giant fingers 
Try to compare the fingers with the part and it can be max. 10 to 15cm, right?
Now, based on my Input it would nice to receive your qualified answer and thanks in advance
Rolf |
Please look at YOUR photo.
The post above is yet another example of how important including scale is in mystery part identification photographs. Are your invisible mystery fingers 3 cm or 30 cm?
Once again, it is silly to post a single photograph of a mystery part without including a complete view of it, and a basic, fundamental description of it.
Why would I bother opening my reference materials when you are too lazy and so discourteous that you cannot photograph and describe it properly?
Serious question. Why?
*** The purpose of this forum is Group Learning and Information Sharing. People who come to the forum merely to harvest information for their own selfish purposes are misusing the forum. ***
If you want a mystery part identified, (1) include scale, (2) take good photos of the complete item, and, (3) include a basic, fundamental description of it.
That way everyone can see and learn from the exercise.
Bronc
PS: I would like to say this item is a control linkage: either flap, aileron or elevator, or slat arm pivot linkage, but without 1-3 above, who knows...