|
Re: Fw 200 C-5, the invisible sub-type? A review of published and documentary sources.
Couldn't agree more, Nick. I remember Peter Cornwell saying how many times people had stated how he had got things wrong for him to remind them that he had written BofB T&N 35+ years before and at that time, the information he was using was the best available....then. As a published author myself, I would be a fool to say what I have written is the definitive; I am always open to constructive criticism and correction
|