Quote:
Originally Posted by Matti Salonen
Have checked the NVM and it clearly says 330222. Of course even the NVM can contain errors, but is there any other source for the WNr. of this loss. If not, I am afraid that for the time being we have to accept this number.
Matti
|
I think the original NVMs are more likely to be correct than the list we had which was copied from them.