|
Re: Ju 88 / 1096
Hi JoMe
Have you details about all other number combinations?
Since humans compile/send on the data probably many times before they actually appear in the GQM report, I cannot see why the aircraft thus can't be 1906 (if that one was built), 7096 (if the digit 1 had been confused with a 7) or some other combination.
Once a fault creep in, it is close to impossible to be 100% certain where it actually is unless all other variables actually are covered.
Cheers
Stig
|