Thread: Ju 88 / 1096
View Single Post
  #6  
Old 23rd September 2020, 16:44
Jim P. Jim P. is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,969
Jim P. will become famous soon enough
Re: Ju 88 / 1096

"Possibly the 1096 was rebuilt after the damage in July 1942 ???"

That's what I was hinting at. There are 3 incidents reported for WNr.1096, Sep-41 (40%), Jul-42 (80%) & Jul-43 (100%). Without documentation to the contrary, you're stuck with what you have.

And I get what Stig is saying, but if you start diddling with the numbers, again without documentation to support the changes, you're introducing more "fault creep".
Reply With Quote