View Single Post
  #10  
Old 6th June 2021, 20:06
John Vasco's Avatar
John Vasco John Vasco is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Norwich, originally Liverpool
Posts: 1,212
John Vasco will become famous soon enough
Re: Information sort on Fw Helmut Lußky - flier with 3.ZG1

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stig Jarlevik View Post
John

I have a problem with the WNr 4096 (or rather two).
According to Mankau this was a Bf 110 E-1
Secondly I have it listed as 80% damaged with 6./ZG 26 on 5 Nov 1941 when it force landed at Dugino after being damaged in combat.

Was the aircraft upgraded to an F-2?
Presumably one WNr is wrong, either yours or the one I list, but which one?

Cheers
Stig
Stig,
The information I published in my 'Sting of the Luftwaffe' book was taken from the Luftwaffe Quartermaster's returns that I examined at the IWM in London. The book was published in 2001, before the Petrick/Mankau book, which, since I got my copy, I have used as a reference point for W. Nr & variants.

I agree with you that 4096 is an E-1. Furthermore, looking at the photos of S9+KL on page 56 of my book, my simple conclusion is that it is a Bf 110 E.

I therefore happily stand corrected on what I published in 2001.

One possible reason for the mix-up is that SKG 210 & ZG 1 had been operating Bf 110 Es from the start of the Russian campaign, and only took on the 'F' variant towards the end of May 1942. So, the groundcrew then would be sending up the line details of two different types of Bf 110s lost/damaged. I therefore think the error occurred at Staffel 'pen-pushers' level.

Thanks for your input - appreciated.
__________________
Wir greifen schon an!

Splinter Live at The Cavern, November 2006: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxOCksQUKbI

Danke schön, Dank schön ich bin ganz comfortable!
Reply With Quote