|
Re: In hindsight, who was the top day scorer?
I think it matters.
Hartmann's "352" is known to both young and old around the world.
So once again, how could it be done, hypothetically speaking, a correction of the record that would reveal to the world that Hartmann's 352 and Barkhorn's 301, and etc., etc., etc., are NOT real numbers, WITHOUT questioning their integrity? There are cultural complexities involved--this is a delicate situation--BUT history deserves the correction, no?
I'm thinking Rall, Lipfert, Bar, Hackl (or whomever) deserves international recognition if indeed the actual evidence shows them to likely be, The One.
Bronc
|