|
Re: 7/KG55 casualty 28 - 08 - 40
Thanks Leo
My finger trouble. WNr 5621 it is (I have amended my mistake above)
Odd that Steenbeck does not make the connections in his book, since I am pretty certain those who
read the passages do (I did for example)
Also seems Peter Cornwell did as well.
Black6
No you are not a nuisance. All I say it is far better if you follow simple rules when asking for further information.
a) Don't add items which is not in your heading. Start a new thread instead.
b) Give your sources since it makes things much easier for everyone. There are plenty of people here who
answers threads only to learn that the individual who asks already have the details in exactly the same source quoted.
Cheers
Stig
|