|
Re: Question regarding a victory for Heinz Bär 07/08/44
His claim is unfounded....my astonishment is that,in his application for approval,he did not provide any reasons to support it(he saw NOTHING of the "fate of his victim" and has NO WITNESSES.
It's obvious(?) that the OKL cannot have approved his claim!....or what?
Nevertheless,this one seems to be accounted for,in a lot of publications (often serious).....but based on what??
Can someone explain this "magic" trick?
Michel
|