[Stig Jarlevik]

And how is this re-evaluation of these claims made?

New documents unknown by 1991?

New interpretation of already given facts, ie in 1991 the French could not read their own writings, but
by 2023 they have learned how do that?

Since both Porret and Thevenet were writing more or less on behalf of the French Government (both
books were published by SHAA), have the new findings also official support, or is it individual's research
statements Michel is talking about?

I do hope we are not about to get into the same controversy which surrounds Clostermann's claims with
these revisions.....

Cheers
Stig