Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim P.
The problem with that ID though it certainly seems logical, is that the kill tally on the tail doesn't match Oesau's at the time - think he had 40+. I think this was discussed here previously.
|
You are correct Jim. He actually had claimed 58 by that time. Perhaps they had not been confirmed, although that does seem a stretch between 58 and the number of marks on the tail. However, everything else fits.