|
Re: Me109E Info Wk Nr
Jim
Since you now have corrected the WNr 1369 into 5240 in the other 109 thread you replied to,
what should we do with the "real" WNr 1369 in this thread?
If Mombeek and Valtonen are correct, the WNr referred to as 1369 by Prien should in fact be 1639,
meaning we thus have nothing on WNr 1369....
Cheers
Stig
|