Stig,
As my sources are likely to be those used by yourself, I am tempted to just agree with the information you have provided.But anyway,since we're guessing...
My obvious concern is when we see machines like No.36 described as a CEP 1B2 in D&S. Could be. I certainly can't tell from the photo. This is why in my last post I suggested that it was at least possible that No.11 is a CEP 2 B2. Wildly speculative,but given the failure of the 1B2 due to being underpowered,might it be possible the the original 1B2 order was higher than 14 and that following cancellation,machines nearing completion were completed with the original SFA number and 2 B2 machines took some of the numbers of the canceled 1B2s,thus meaning No.36 for example is not an error on the part of D&S and that No.11 is a 2 B2... Like I say,speculation.
I see wisely Albin Denis has numbers 1 - 61 as CEP X. Very prudent. The only hope here is that new material is published it would appear.But note this from Luigino Caliaro at
https://www.key.aero/article/caproni...ultimate-guide
'At least 90 aircraft were constructed under licence by REP, 60 of them CEP 1 Bn2 examples with rotary engines and 30 comprising CEP 2 Bn2 models using Isotta Fraschini powerplants. In February 1916 these tri-motors were assigned to the newly formed Escadrille CEP 115, part of Groupe de Bombardement (GB) 1. Based at Nancy-Malzéville, the unit flew its maiden combat mission on 22 June 1916. CEP 130 was formed during August 1917 and assigned to GB 2, which also incorporated CEP 115 in March 1918.' Different again,and from a reputable author.
Regards,
Clint