|
Re: Losses of JG5
Not sure if II./JG 5 operated both the F-2 and F-4 subversions at the same time but both
WNr 9239 and 12615 listed by the GQM were F-2s and not F-4s
No idea from where Prien et al got their data since they must have used the GQM as well
Three printing errors at the same time seems a bit too much.....
Cheers
Stig
|