My interpretation of a post in this thread by the FTA forum administrator
shows they view Christopher Shores has a revisionist out to get the AVG.
Just like their view of Daniel Ford.
I have heard that Christopher Shores has written a lot of slander against the AVG, which has been gleefully picked up by other "historians" and reported on. All without ANY supporting evidence.
Lydia Rossi
http://forums.flyingtigersavg.com/ub...ML/001776.html
Opinions??