Irving is an idiot, (in terms of interpretation of historical evidence), but his books contain interesting information. IMHO Mr Evans has gone over the edge with
Quote:
|
"Not one of his books, speeches or articles, not one paragraph, not one sentence in any of them, can be taken on trust as an accurate representation of its historical subject. All of them are completely worthless as history, because Irving cannot be trusted anywhere, in any of them, to give a reliable account of what he is talking or writing about."
|
What about a sentence in his biography of Milch saying that he passed away? LOL!!!
An unbiased analysis would be that this would be true in some cases and not true in others.
K