Re: 65 anniversary of Katyn massacre
Katyn and genocide?
It was not genocide by all means, it was execution of anti-soviet representatives of capitalist classes to prevent any possible resistance on returned russian territories (which were getting back to Russia from Poland in Sept 1939 by Molotov-Ribbentrop Treaty)
millions of Soviets were executed by commies for political reasons in 1917-1953.
Should we treat all what happened with Soviet people in XX century as genocide? Probably, yes.
Should we use the same definition for Katyn massacre?
No, because those poor Poles were just a small speck of dust in the universe of war for communist future of the human race. It's impossible to dedicate them from the whole bloody picture and say that killing Polish people is something extraordinary for Soviets and might be treated as something personal against Poland and Polish people.
For good commie there is no nationality, only class nature matters. All killed Poles were officers. Capitalists for soviets. That's why they were doomed.
And last but not the least:
Should Russians call genocide the killing of 100 thousand Soviet POWs in Poland in 1920-21? I have heard Poles don't like to talk about it.
And what about 1612? Was it genocide on Russian people?
Sorry, I think this anti-russian thread is stupid
Last edited by Mazila; 25th April 2005 at 00:10.
|