View Single Post
  #4  
Old 19th November 2007, 09:51
kalender1973 kalender1973 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 184
kalender1973 is on a distinguished road
Re: Suffix "Er" With GQM returns

Hi Remi, Hi Ed,

the meaning of „Er“ is clear for me. Unclear why it is not used later and how was the new planes was requested.

Why is the information important ? I have a feeling that we understand wrong the damage category of LW. The most research books claims “10% damage” – easy to repair. But this “Er” shows that it was not “easy to repair” and the damaged plane must be replaced. And that is in quite peaceful air base condition (regarding the maintenance equipment, short logistic way etc.) And what should we say about “10% damage” in Africa or in Caucasus?
__________________
Igor
Reply With Quote