|
Re: Suffix "Er" With GQM returns
Hi Remi, Hi Ed,
the meaning of „Er“ is clear for me. Unclear why it is not used later and how was the new planes was requested.
Why is the information important ? I have a feeling that we understand wrong the damage category of LW. The most research books claims “10% damage” – easy to repair. But this “Er” shows that it was not “easy to repair” and the damaged plane must be replaced. And that is in quite peaceful air base condition (regarding the maintenance equipment, short logistic way etc.) And what should we say about “10% damage” in Africa or in Caucasus?
__________________
Igor
|