View Single Post
  #8  
Old 2nd January 2008, 20:11
Stig Jarlevik Stig Jarlevik is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,208
Stig Jarlevik will become famous soon enoughStig Jarlevik will become famous soon enough
Re: Sept. 9th, or 20th,1939?

Thanks Peter

I am indeed looking forward a lot to your opus! It is going to be heaven sent to get an ENGLISH book about the campaign and not only have to grapple with my lousy French....

Wish someone would do a day-by-day book about the Battle of Poland as well.

I now understand that what you have against a solution on Sept 20th is the times listed in the reports. One solution of course is that, since the two last digits are more or less the same .47H and .45H, and, of course, a sloppily written SECOND digit 1 with a long "nose" added (don't know otherwise what that is called in English ) could be taken as a digit 4.... Worse mistakes have happened in the past I guess... But then of course did Germany and Britain in France use the same clock or were the Germans always one hour ahead? If yes, my theory goes down the drain...again...

Cheers
Stig
Reply With Quote