[RT]

In fact the discussion is not , at my sense , the loss are worth the damages caused ??, but is there any sense to throw bombs as near blind, just to obliged ennemy to build-up its defence, compare to WWII the qties of bombs dropped over vietnam was quite more considerable without having caused the expected results
Yes the losses suffered by the KG during the Baby-blitz were soft , more serious hv been the high consume of gasoline, to prepare nd conduct those raids, not speaking of the relatively poor response bombers gave after to the Normandy "raid",
Even Goering at the time of "baedecker" was not convince of utility of these bombings

remi

Germans were never in position to conduct a Strategic war, people could also thing that even England don't hv the means of this politic, just the US with the atomic-bomb....