Re: Seeking Confirmation of a 234 Sqn Loss
Hello Jerry,
Thanks for the reply.
That's an interesting site, had not seen it before.
Still only gives ace's though as far as i have seen so far.
234 to 64 is odd it that CWG and other sources give 234, yet Norman Franks update has it as 64.
Any idea as to contacting him, I used to have an e-mail address some while ago, but no responce now.
All for now
Alex
|