Thread
:
DO-17 3445 KG 2
View Single Post
#
13
6th July 2008, 15:23
Stig Jarlevik
Alter Hase
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,232
Re: DO-17 3445 KG 2
Thanks Andreas
I notice you
maintain
that WNr 3445 was the one that was lost in spite of several contributors stating that this loss was later changed to WNr 3345.
Which is the truth?
Cheers
Stig
Stig Jarlevik
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Stig Jarlevik
Find all posts by Stig Jarlevik