View Single Post
  #34  
Old 2nd August 2008, 15:48
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 129
Crumpp
Re: Performance of the Fw 190A on the Deck?

Quote:
Well, the polar method is the correct method


Once again, an argument of your own determination. The specific performance determination for an individual aircraft has not ever been disputed with the exception of pointing out that you do not couple the affects and take the calculation to it's conclusion.

You simply fail to see the forest for the trees. Your informal education is telling when you fail to recognize the value and mechanics of a simple parametric study.

Credit to James E. Lewis, "Modern Jet Transport Performance":




Quote:
I teached you how to use the polar



What? Stop with the creepy weirdness.

I am sorry but Embry Riddle taught me to performance calculations in courses like ASCI 310 and ASCI 510.

From my online unofficial transcript in my undergrad days. That is my GPA in bold at the time I completed ASCI 310:

Quote:
ASCI 310 01D4 Aircraft Performance 3.00 3.00I/A 12.00
Quote:
Term 4.000 3.00 3.00 12.00
Cum 4.000 6.00 81.00 24.00
Some gamer with an internet education had nothing to do with my aeronautical science education. In fact most internet educated individuals suffer from exactly the same problem with an inability to put it all together.

Good Luck. Find someone else to stalk please.

Crumpp

Last edited by Crumpp; 2nd August 2008 at 16:37. Reason: Added credit to the Parametric Study excerpt