The link below (in French) is the copy of an article of the French "Revue Historique des Armées", the official history magazine of the French Army, written in 1985 and describing the French bomber attack against Sedan bridges on 14 May 1940.
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/xavier.d...er/revhist.htm
In the conclusion, the far more massive commitment and losses of the RAF Blenheim and Battles is evocated, but with comments I have not seen before:
"Quant au bombardement anglais, le récit repris partout de l’écrivain quasi officiel Peter Ellis est impressionnant : 73 Battle et 36 Blenheim seraient allés bombarder les ponts de Sedan et 45 auraient été abattus. Mais les comptes rendus britanniques que l’on trouve au SHAA à Vincennes font apparaître une grande incohérence de ce côté : confusion de lieu, bombardement de troupes françaises et de ponts en territoire ami, et méconnaissance là aussi du seul objectif valable ce jour-là : le pont de bateaux de Gaulier. C’est un autre point d’histoire à éclaircir."
My translation:
"Concerning the English bombers, the story repeated everywhere of the the quasi-official writer Peter Ellis is impressive: 73 Battle and 36 Blenheim were sent to bomb Sedan bridges and 45 were shot down. But the British reports that one can find at the SHAA at Vincennes shot great incoherency on RAF part: confusion of place, bombing of French troops and bridges in friendly territory, and ignorance of the only worthwhile goal that day the boatbridge of Gaulier. This is another historical point to be clarified."
OK, it's 25 years old but I wonder if there is something true there.