|
Re: Rall's claims
Very good argument of the case. The claim (275) could be a mistake involving the attack on Zemke's P-47 considering the condition Rall was in on bail out. Still the the story of Zemke and any 56FG member that witnessed is hard to just dismiss. The one possiblity is that the two loss P-47 were hit so fast that their attackers weren't noticed as Rall entered the picture
|