Quote:
Originally Posted by Jukka Juutinen
John Vasco recommended Stephen Bungay. However, according to an amazon.co.uk review, Bungay has taken too many liberties in his interpretation of many documents. The examples provided in that review are most worrisome.
And hasn't Bersgtröm's research received a lot of flak on this board as well?
Granted, neither of the above prove or disprove the original claim.
BTW, the interpretation that Steve's original claim "denigrates" those mentioned authors is, to be honest, as true as claiming the Merlin to be a rotary.
|
1. Tell me of the 'liberties' he has taken; and
2. Tell me the flak Bergström's book has received. I have my own views on the errors with regard to the Bf 110, but his assessment of other more general things (as I have pointed out in a previous post) is worthy of full consideration.