View Single Post
  #13  
Old 23rd October 2022, 21:41
MW Giles MW Giles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Worcestershire
Posts: 704
MW Giles is on a distinguished road
Re: B-17 Photo Recon over Japan before Doolittle raid

OK, so I have read the book so that nobody else has to. That is four hours of my life that I will never see again. Deeply unconvincing, to put it mildly. The following major problems noted:
Most of the story is done in a way that does not give specifics that can be checked
The squadron the crew in the story belonged to is never given, although it is mentioned that 13 B-17s were sent to Hawaii by the unit at the time of Pearl Harbour, which implies we are looking at the 19th BG. The story (p66) describes listening to the R/T from the planes landing on Hawaii while under attack, listening from a base in California.
The recon flight to Tokyo is to be made by 3 B-17Ds (serials for fictitious B-17s are given 4375, 4376 and 4377). This is even though B-17Es were in service by this point
The book says turrets are removed from the Ds for the flight. Not sure they had any anyway. But over Tokyo it is mentioned that gunners are manning guns, therefore armament clearly not removed to save weight.
The flight in the book is Wright Field – Recife (Brazil) – Lagos (Nigeria) – Agra (India) and then the recon flight is Agra – Osaka – Nagoya- Yokahama – Tokyo – Dutch Harbour, all without additional stops.
The latter recon flight is confirmed as 6500 miles. No indication how the extra fuel is crammed into the B-17, apart form the use of 65 x 5 gal drums that are transferred in fight into the main fuel system in some unspecified way. No indication how they provided oxygen or engine oil for that length of flight either. Transfer from 5 gal drums, in flight, is asking for an explosion. Tins punctured and thrown overboard into sea (hope they were empty otherwise the crew get covered in the last quarter pint of fuel at the bottom of the drum)
Take off weight at Agra is given as 73,000 lbs, this is considerably in excess of a B-17G at max weight.
The Tokyo tanks of the later B-17F of 1943 are supposedly the means of providing the required extra fuel, however IRL they only provided an additional 1100 or so gals, not the extra 2500 needed for the flight (see previous post). The normal capacity of a D was only 1700 gals, with an addition of 792 gals in the bomb bay, making 2492 gals. We need to add the same again for this flight
During the flight at high altitude, up to 37000ft, there is a fuel leak and the crew find it as a puddle in the bomb bay by using their sense of smell. No mention of them all passing out from lack of oxygen when taking their masks off to check.
Fuel consumption is given as 118 to 122 gals/hr, when a real B-17 burns nearer 360 lbs per hour.
Apparently they could not take any liquid to drink on their 30 hour flight as liquid freezes at altitude, thermos or vacuum flasks are apparently unknown in the States.
For some reason, unspecified, they have to come down to around 11,000ft for photo run from Osaka to Tokyo before climbing back to 30,000 ft for flight to Dutch Harbour. Why they needed to expose themselves to flak and fighters in this way is unclear. They started descending before reaching area, therefore this was planned and not due to weather.
None of the navigation difficulties are covered or discussed. The landing procedures are all using VHF in very modern ways, which is surprising for Recife, Lagos and Agra in 1942. The author does not appear to have heard of W/T and does not know what a wireless operator is for.
A submarine and destroyer are contacted as they pass using VHF. The submarine appears to be submerged at the time!
They are homed onto Dutch Harbour by radar and VHF from range of 167 miles. Apparently IFF would have extended that range to 280 miles. Hmmm. No mention of MF radio beacons or DF bearings.
The tower makes direct reference to radar over the R/T– definite security breach.
A C-54 is waiting on the ground to take the photos to Washington. Actually the first C-54 flew in Feb 42 but the plane did not go into production until 1943! Another C-54 turns up the next morning with Colonel Doolittle aboard to congratulate everyone. Aleutians to Washington DC and back in a day in a prototype a/c shortly after its first flight. The Colonel's plane apparently made a radar controlled approach to a fog bound airfield in 1942!
The book says they take off on the recon mission from Agra on the night of Friday the 26th March. The 26th March 1942 was actually a Thursday. The author could have meant the early hours of the Friday, but that is not what he said.
They are over Tokyo on the afternoon of the 27th (2 to 4 pm) and land after a total of 30 hours in the air. This is given as the 28th. Except they crossed the international date line going East, which means they lost a day, and they should have landed on the 27th, assuming it took over ten hours to go 2750 miles.
Officer on Hawaii is talking about Japanese codes and says it is OK for him to get the info as he is cleared for Ultra. Careless
P/O John McGee (of High Flight fame) is mentioned as stationed at Digby on the south coast of England and later as at Digby in Sussex – I hope it is still in Lincolnshire, in the Midlands. Apparently McGee was in the Battle of Britain, even though he really joined 412 Sqn in mid/late 1941. The fiancé of the fictional John McGee apparently made a transatlantic phone call to Digby and was told of his death (p92). International calls were suspended at the start of the war for the general public.
Someone is described as having shot down 4 Fw190s by Feb 1942 (p240). That is some going considering they only joined II/JG26 in August in 1941.
On p422 the author talks about where he got the story from. Norman Nelson worked at Wright Field and converted B-17s for recon purposes. A number of other people at Wright Field are listed as possibly knowing about the Tokyo recon flight and the author spoke to two of them. None of the pilots, crew or others others actually involved in the supposed flights are listed or described as being interviewed.
Conclusion – were B-17s converted to a longer range recon configuration in 1942 – possibly. Did the recon mission over Tokyo take place as described – highly unlikely in my view.

Last edited by MW Giles; 24th October 2022 at 13:28.
Reply With Quote