Thanks Ed
Fair enough even if I personally think it is strange to lay out two batches with such similar Wnr ranges.
No idea by the way what Griehl has used for his sources...
I note one more discrepancy. Brian Bines mentions WNr 100029 as damaged on 16.2.1945. You state only 45 Ju 352 were built (presumably out of the 50 WNr you list), which, if built in order, means 352 10001 to 10020 and 352 100001 to 100025. How then do we explain WNr 100029?
Finally I am also interested in the Stkz of the Ju 352
From Griehl I have for 352 10001 to 352 10020 (I have now deleted one zero from his batch) CH+JA to CH+JT. Is that correct?
From those you mention is it correct to asssume WNr 352 100001 to 100025 were KT+VA to KT+VY?
Also if WNr 352 100026 to 100030 in fact were built, what were their Stkz?
Guessing, I suppose 352 100026 could have been KT+VZ, but then again what about the rest?
Cheers
Stig