View Single Post
  #5  
Old 5th January 2018, 20:11
edNorth edNorth is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,126
edNorth is on a distinguished road
Re: Additional details on two Nachtjagd losses NJG3 and 3./NJG11, 4-5 November 1944

Quote:
Originally Posted by Theo Boiten View Post
Hello Lilsis and Matti,
Thanks for both your replies, so the Ju88 at Katwijk in fact was a He111 at Kootwijk. Reason for asking is that the rear gunner of 166 Squadron Lancaster PB153 claimed an attacking Ju88 as probably destroyed some 10 km west of The Hague at 19.16 hrs. I've no German report for a Ju88 (or other type of ac) damaged or lost in combat at this stage, so the Ju88 will remain unidentified for now. Cheers, Theo
Strange reasoning say plane still unindentifed, when in fact not Ju 88, and is indentified as He 111 by Matti abowe. Claim therefore seems wrong type.
Ed
Reply With Quote