Quote:
Originally Posted by Christer Bergström
those that some seem bent on trying to denounce
|
1. Who's really denouncing who, on this forum or even in literature?
2. There is actually a lot of irrelevant material in this thread.
First the idea that French fighter pilots are being slighted wholesale by the world, by the British, by the french, by everyone, except a few honorable men...
nonsense
Second a thread basically dealing with a single book by a single writer, who's occused of anything but canibalism and child molesting, but those are probably lesser crimes
However this book seems to be a reoccuring theme, call it the catalyst, to fuel this ongoing pashionate blaze.
What I don't see is any reasoned argument, I see a lot of irrelevant writing about pre-war france and even the fact that little Holland was attacked by Germans in dutch uniforms, but not a
solid thing about why Sholto Douglas is unequivocaly wrong, or proof that Townsend misinterpreted his annecdote.
The accusation is one of forgery and lies, should these statements not be backed up some
relevant facts?
This post is not a personal attack against
anyone.
I do not remember reading about
french traitors, cowards and murderers, about french forgers and liars etc etc etc. But every now and then this AA vs RAF theme pops up and these words fly...towards the British that is.
So I'll ask all of you a question.
Why should I allow this thread to continue?
Should I allow this discussion ever to raise its head again?
If not with reason and objectively, not at all.