Luftwaffe Aces of the Battle of Britain

[Chris Goss]

For those who do not have a copy, reprint is off to the printers. Few new photos and tweaks to the first edition. Not sure is paperback or hardback. Foe those who saw the ill-informed negative review on Amazon, the book is exactly what it says on the blurb-bios of those who got 5 kills and above

[Edward]

Luftwaffe Aces in the Battle of Britain [revised]
(Air World, imprint of Casemate - 30 January 2026)
by Chris Goss
320 pages w/ c. 300 b&w illustrations - paperback
$34.95 US

"The term ‘fighter ace’ grew in prominence with the introduction and development of aerial combat in the First World War. The actual number of aerial victories required to officially qualify as an ‘ace’ has varied but is usually considered to be five or more.

For the Luftwaffe, a number of its fighter pilots, many of whom had fought with the Legion Condor in Spain, had already gained their Experte, or ace, status in the Battle of France. However, many more would achieve that status in the hectic dogfights over southern England and the Channel during the Battle of Britain in the summer of 1940. A number would also be either killed or captured. Some of these men, individuals such as Adolf Galland, Werner Mölders, and Helmut Wick, who between them had claimed 147 aerial victories by 31 October 1940, are well-known, but most are less so.

In this book, the story of each of the Luftwaffe’s 204 Messerschmitt Bf 109 ‘aces’ from the summer of 1940 is examined, with all of the individual biographies, detailing individual fates during the war, being highly illustrated throughout. Original German records from the summer of 1940, have been examined, providing a definitive list of each pilot’s individual claims. It also covers, to a lesser extent, those forgotten fifty-three Messerschmitt Bf 110 pilots who also achieved ace status by day and also by night between 10 July and 31 October 1940."

https://www.casematepublishers.com/9...le-of-britain/

[Chris Goss]

Thanks Edward. Paperback it is but they are naughty not saying it is a revised reprint

[edwest2]

"revised reprint" is missing. I've seen other sloppiness along this line.