Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Allied and Soviet Air Forces

Allied and Soviet Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the Air Forces of the Western Allies and the Soviet Union.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11th March 2011, 16:30
DavidIsby DavidIsby is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 1,305
DavidIsby will become famous soon enoughDavidIsby will become famous soon enough
Aboukir air filter on Spit V - performance?

Of all the kit that has been hung on Spitfires, nothing seems to have attracted as much dislike as the Aboukir filter.

Does anyone know of a source for the details of how badly it cut Spitfire V performance? What was the ram recovery ratio (what ratio of possible air intake actually makes it into the supercharger – 50% for a basic Spitfire IA)? What did it add to overall drag?

Thanks,
David Isby
__________________
author of THE DECISIVE DUEL: SPITFIRE VS 109, published by Little Brown. Visit its website at: http://Spitfirevs109.com
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11th March 2011, 17:27
Graham Boak Graham Boak is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lancashire, UK
Posts: 1,680
Graham Boak is on a distinguished road
Re: Aboukir air filter on Spit V - performance?

You are thinking of the Vokes filter: the Aboukir version was a local Mediterranean fit which was thought to give less drag. I have never seen any specific aerodynamic information quoted for the Aboukir filter, but it certainly had less surface area which would reduce external drag. The total penalty would come from the sum of the increased external drag and the "internal drag" of the system, which would be expressed in terms of a loss in power of the engine. Data showing the performance effects of the Vokes filter can be seen in Hawker Hurricane from MacDonalds (many years ago) - contact me offline. I believe that these are predicted and/or test figures, and it seems that the performance loss was greater in service.

I don't recognise your figure of ram air recovery. This is normally expressed in terms of the pressure loss, or perhaps rather the pressure gain from receiving air in motion. This will only be a few % - 2% comes to mind but I don't recall the context. The Vokes filter effectively stopped the air still whilst passing through it, removing any such benefit. The later Aerovee filter had a bypass so that away from the ground the air passed freely.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RAF Bomber Command 'Y' Reports Bruce Dennis Allied and Soviet Air Forces 8 29th December 2011 21:58
National Archives Kew David P. Williams Allied and Soviet Air Forces 17 4th June 2010 01:44
Airpower summary Pilot Post-WW2 Military and Naval Aviation 0 23rd February 2007 15:11
VVS divisions Mike35nj Allied and Soviet Air Forces 2 7th August 2006 13:27
Aircraft performance curves Christer Bergström Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 17 19th November 2005 21:49


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 00:36.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net