![]() |
|
Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Ju88 WNr.1050
Hi,
On reading the 'Luftwaffe im Focus' article on flamethrower-equipped Ju88s (issue 19), I note on page 25, the captions for photos 28/29 note this aircraft as Ju88A-4, W.Nr.1050, coded 9K+FB. Clearly evident, however, is the early style A-1/A-5 vertical tailplane and rudder. On pages 26/27, a photo shows this aircraft again with the early style vertical tailplane, but also showing the 'blistered' rear canopy, extended wingtips and seemingly broader bladed propellors all reminiscent of the later A-4 subtype, all of which is encapsulated in Claes Sundin's excellent colour profile included with the article. My queries are: a) was this combination of early A-1/A-5 vertical tail but otherwise A-4 characteristics common and b) was W.Nr.1050 originally built with this mixture of parts or might it have been an upgrade? Thanks in advance for any assistance. Regards, Paul |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ju88 WNr.1050
Dear Paul
I have not seen this article nor profile. Having seen other Claes Sundin profile of Ju 88 C-6, it appears straight out of box, so to speak, good but not exceptional (research wise). I say this after having researched the type for some years and made own large scale drawings. a.) Common? Yes. First A-4 indeed had straight-up tip rudders. Vertical fin was basically the same. But A-4 rudder was metal covered, whilst previous A-1/5 had this fabric covered. Perhaps you did not know that. b.) Aerodynamic balanced rudders appeared (autumn 1941) long after A-4 entered production (the Jumo 211 J engines ruling the designation here), but VDM metal props appeared again on Ju 88 D-5 in winter 1941/1942, due to Wood props bottlenecks. W.Nr. (088)1050 appears "quite normal built" to me. c.) No offense meant. Please leave space between in the designation Ju 88 A-4. Respecting how the designations were most often written is respecting how things were. Changing this into Ju88A-4 as one entity had done deliberately is misleading to those who perhaps do not know better. I have said this before. We all know this, do we not? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RLM_air...gnation_system http://www.designation-systems.net/non-us/germany.html Best regards Ed |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Ju88 WNr.1050
Hi, Ed...
I live and learn. Indeed, I wasn't aware of the early A-4s having the straight-hinged rudder. Thanks for taking time to clarify this and other characteristics for me Kindest regards, Paul |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Entry into service with Recon Squadrons of the Ju88 | Larry Hickey | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 23 | 20th January 2012 20:12 |
Identity of He177 or Ju88 destroyed 24/2/44? | Danny Hill | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 2 | 17th October 2008 20:32 |
VVS Top pilots: some tables from M.Bykov's book | Evgeny Velichko | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 18 | 30th March 2008 08:18 |
JU88 Encounter | Stephen Smith | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 1 | 23rd January 2008 18:14 |
Unclaimed Ju88 losses in the Battle of Britain | Larry | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 1 | 8th January 2005 17:38 |