Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces

Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 4th January 2020, 10:03
TigerTimon TigerTimon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Gelderland
Posts: 406
TigerTimon is on a distinguished road
Re: Do 17Z-7

Heavily is kind of big word indeed. Substantial would be a better fit.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 4th January 2020, 12:19
Stig Jarlevik Stig Jarlevik is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,280
Stig Jarlevik will become famous soon enoughStig Jarlevik will become famous soon enough
Re: Do 17Z-7

Well Tiger

Even substantial is in my books far worse than 10%....

Cheers
Stig
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 4th January 2020, 13:28
Nick Beale's Avatar
Nick Beale Nick Beale is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Exeter, England
Posts: 6,209
Nick Beale is a jewel in the roughNick Beale is a jewel in the roughNick Beale is a jewel in the roughNick Beale is a jewel in the rough
Re: Do 17Z-7

From TSAMO, I've attached the sitrep extract for the night of 8-9 November (assuming this is the right one). It ran across two pages so I made a composite image.

Regarding any "Feindberührung", see the passage: "Our night fighters had engagements with two Spitfires and one twin-engined fighter. One Spitfire was probably shot down in the process."

It says on later pages that 10 night fighters were operating and that total losses on the 8th were 3 Ju 87 and a Ju 88. Later still, without giving a time or place, it mentions defence by "3 night fighters with unsuccessful attack".

Given that the Do 17 under discussion crashed on the 9th, it may be relevant that that day's sitrep gives total losses as one Do 17 and two Ju 88.
__________________
Nick Beale
http://www.ghostbombers.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 4th January 2020, 20:59
TigerTimon TigerTimon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Gelderland
Posts: 406
TigerTimon is on a distinguished road
Re: Do 17Z-7

Welp, sorry about that... I was too quick.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 4th January 2020, 14:17
TigerTimon TigerTimon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Gelderland
Posts: 406
TigerTimon is on a distinguished road
Re: Do 17Z-7

Must be an error in Boiten's work then, regarding the Feindberührung?

Timon
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 4th January 2020, 14:40
Theo Boiten Theo Boiten is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,195
Theo Boiten will become famous soon enoughTheo Boiten will become famous soon enough
Re: Do 17Z-7

no error here -the Nahnachtjäger reported no enemy contact/Feindberührung ..

Cheers, Theo
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 28th January 2020, 23:17
Carsten Petersen Carsten Petersen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 237
Carsten Petersen is on a distinguished road
Re: Do 17Z-7

Hi Benno
Thanks for the information

What series of books are Vijf jaar luchtfront ?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Do 17 Z-5 with KüFlGr 606 Chris Goss Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 7 14th May 2022 13:45
Dornier 17Z losses Maubeuge 16.5.40 steve sheridan Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 2 19th July 2008 17:32
Do 17Z bombisght szukajacy Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 7 31st July 2007 18:02
Do 17Z defection to Italy on 5 June 1944 Boris Ciglic Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 5 22nd September 2005 23:08
Do 17Z tail Pawel Burchard Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 2 8th August 2005 20:45


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 17:55.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net