Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces

Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 20th May 2008, 08:21
harrison987 harrison987 is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,480
harrison987 is on a distinguished road
Me109G-10 Dual Production Plates

I am confused by the reason for the 2 production plates on the fuselage side.

It was already proven that the second plate did not indicate an older airframe updraged to G-10, as all G-10's were made new.

JaPo's G-10/U4 book explains it indicated "changes" at time of production, but the book does not explain the types of changes.

Were these "changes" possibly repairs done to damaged machines which had not yet left the hands of the manufacture - such as a replacement part after a failed test-flight or damaged while in transport?

The G-10 did have some upgrades as the months went on, but I do not think enough to warrant a second plate.

Can anyone clarify this?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 20th May 2008, 11:43
Micke D Micke D is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 118
Micke D
Re: Me109G-10 Dual Production Plates

Not an answer to your question, but many (all?) of the Fw 190D-9s produced by Fieseler seems to have had two plates on the fuselage.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 20th May 2008, 16:17
Franek Grabowski Franek Grabowski is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 2,445
Franek Grabowski is on a distinguished road
Re: Me109G-10 Dual Production Plates

New may mean new built parts or subassemblies from older variants like G-6.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 20th May 2008, 18:53
harrison987 harrison987 is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,480
harrison987 is on a distinguished road
Re: Me109G-10 Dual Production Plates

HI Franek...

Ah yes...but...no old subassmeblies (G-6) were used on the G-10. All G-10's were made new.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 21st May 2008, 04:39
stephen f. polyak's Avatar
stephen f. polyak stephen f. polyak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 508
stephen f. polyak is on a distinguished road
Re: Me109G-10 Dual Production Plates

Here's what I believe the second plate looked like (note: there was more than one version/style of this type of multi-entry box plate):

http://www.mediafire.com/imageview.p...2a3lmh&thumb=4

I believe the word "änderungsstufe" roughly translates to "changes". Is that correct?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 21st May 2008, 09:10
harrison987 harrison987 is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,480
harrison987 is on a distinguished road
Re: Me109G-10 Dual Production Plates

Hi Stephen,

Yes, that is correct! The spaces were for dates from what I understand...

mike
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 21st May 2008, 21:56
Nick Beale's Avatar
Nick Beale Nick Beale is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Exeter, England
Posts: 6,168
Nick Beale is a jewel in the roughNick Beale is a jewel in the roughNick Beale is a jewel in the roughNick Beale is a jewel in the rough
Re: Me109G-10 Dual Production Plates

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephen f. polyak View Post
I believe the word "änderungsstufe" roughly translates to "changes". Is that correct?
It means a little more, I think. It means "alteration level/stage" and I have an example of an Fw 190 "Receiving "alteration 137" which I would guess was a modification specified for all aircraft of a given model (or performing a given role).
__________________
Nick Beale
http://www.ghostbombers.com
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 22nd May 2008, 09:04
harrison987 harrison987 is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,480
harrison987 is on a distinguished road
Re: Me109G-10 Dual Production Plates

HI Tomislav!

Question...

"The Änderungsstufe plate was added to indicate subsequent changes that might appear during the operational use of the aircraft"

Only dates were added into this spot, as shown on the G-10 here in the USA...so if it was intended to indicate changes, why only show a date? Seems reduntant, unless the chnages were indicated as well. Also, why were these plate not found on all G-10's? and why ONLY G-10's?

Seems odd, no?

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 21st May 2008, 11:35
ArtieBob ArtieBob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sharps Chapel, TN USA
Posts: 448
ArtieBob will become famous soon enoughArtieBob will become famous soon enough
Re: Me109G-10 Dual Production Plates

IMHO, some of the confusion may relate to two items. First, the length of time a major component of an aircraft, i.e., the fuselage may have been in inventory before it reached final assembly. I am not as familiar with the details of Bf 109 manufacturing as with some other Luftwaffe types but generally, fuselage, wings, power “egg”, empennage, etc., might not have been manufactured at the final assembly point. The fuselage generally carried the RLM W.Nr. for the aircraft and, in cases that can be documented, the RLM W.Nr. was assigned at the fuselage subassembly point. There might be weeks or even months between leaving the subassembly site and reaching final assembly, photos show fields full of Bf 109 fuselages awaiting wing, power eggs, etc.
Second, it would appear that whether an aircraft was considered Neubau or Umbau would depend when the BAL acceptance was made, thus a fuselage intended to become a G-6, if it was in production inventory, might be modified before final assembly and BAL acceptance to become another subtype and still be considered Neubau. If one looks at the acceptance sequences they are generally not in W.Nr. sequence. A “new” aircraft might be flown directly to another site following BAL acceptance and modified would be considered Umbau. Of course, when dealing with almost any aspect of Luftwaffe production during the last year of the war, exceptions are the rule and documentation may not exist. The goal was to push completed aircraft out the door (cave, or from under the trees).
Finally, IIRC, von Lutz may have firsthand sighting experience on this subject.
Best Regards,
Artie Bob
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 21st May 2008, 13:43
Grzegorz Cisek Grzegorz Cisek is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 14
Grzegorz Cisek is on a distinguished road
Re: Me109G-10 Dual Production Plates

I am still conviced that the second plate indicated an old airframe rebuilt to the new Bf 109 version. Here you have an example o this :

http://www.yumodel.co.yu/batajnica_a...two_me109s.htm

During G-6 and G-14 reparation they were finished as new G-10. The word "changes" in this case means upgrade to a new version.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fiat CR-32 production batches spanienflieger Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 8 13th October 2006 20:33
italian aircraft production in world war 2 anthony The Second World War in General 2 19th September 2006 17:02
italian aircraft production anthony Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 3 3rd August 2006 20:02
Luftwaffe Aircraft Data Plates stephen f. polyak Wanted 0 13th April 2006 19:20
Data Plates Exposed #5: Do 18 D-1 stephen f. polyak Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 4 23rd February 2006 05:36


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 19:04.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net