![]() |
|
Allied and Soviet Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the Air Forces of the Western Allies and the Soviet Union. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Claim on Bf.109 5th September 1940
Dear all,
On 5th September 1940 Bf.109E-4 Wnr 5454 from 5./JG54 and piloted by Uffz Günther Behse was lost over the North Sea near Southend. According to The Battle of Britian Then and Now this loss was attributed to F/Lt Ryder of 41 Squadron, however checking the RAF Fighter Command Victory claims of WWII I'm not confident if this is the right match as this was achived in the Sheppey area... Anyhow, I hope somebody is specialised in these aerial victories in this period and can help me with a correct match. Thanks in advance, Hans Nauta |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Claim on Bf.109 5th September 1940
Hans,
According to German records Uffz Günter BEHSE of 5./JG54 went missing in Messerschmitt Bf109E-4 (5353) after combat with RAF fighters south-west of Southend at 14.45 hours (BST). This places his loss over the Thames Estuary - Isle of Grain area at around the time when seven RAF fighter units reported engagements with enemy fighters over an area spreading from Thameshaven to the Isle of Sheppey. All told they claimed 18 Bf109s destroyed, plus four probables, and another one damaged. So your question poses a fair degree of challenge for anyone attempting to unravel the combats/claims on this date on your behalf. However, they could well be advised to concentrate on the claims submitted by No. 303 Squadron ? I was most interested to learn that BoBT&N attributes this loss to Norman Ryder of No. 41 Squadron. Can you please advise me in which edition of the book this appears for it does not feature in my text ? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Claim on Bf.109 5th September 1940
Yes, 5454 would be an F.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Claim on Bf.109 5th September 1940
Dear Peter,
Thanks for your response. Well, your comments say enough! We've similar circumstances here over the Dutch coast, although in far less numbers. And even then it turns out to be impossible to match the claims in most cases. But as the BoB period has been more studied I hoped for a positive result. With regard to te sources: I should have written Battle over Britain, the older publication by F. K. Mason, hence my wondering about the match with F/Lt Ryder. Yes John, and at last a typo in the Werknummer. Time for a break, where's my coffee... Best regards, Hans Nauta |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Claim on Bf.109 5th September 1940
Well, the combat was quite a mess, several units being involved. For example, Frantisek shot down a Me 109 attacking a Spitfire pilot who baled out, so Spitfire were involved as well. Poles were bounced by about 12 Me 109s but it seems there were other ones around as well.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Claim on Bf.109 5th September 1940
Hans: Never, never use 'Battle over Britain' as a guide to who shot down whom without checking other sources first. The book at the time it was published was first class and Volume 2 was never updated using other sources
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Claim on Bf.109 5th September 1940
Hello
While on Sept 5, may I ask about the mid-air collision between S/L Hood and F/Lt Webster of 41 Sqn? IIRC Hood was leading his sqn to head on attack against Do 17s when they were bounced by Bf 109s. Again IIRC Ryder believed that Hood and Webster collided, both were killed, but is the collision a fact or the most probably scenario? Is it possible that Hood's or Webster's a/c was hit before collision? TIA Juha |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Claim on Bf.109 5th September 1940
Juha,
Impossible to tell. 'B' Flight of No. 41 Squadron were attacked by superior numbers of Messerschmitt Bf109Es and there was also 'very accurate' AA fire so it's anyone's guess. Certainly, Hood's wingman 'Wally' Wallens has recorded that 'in the melee that followed, 'Robin' and Terry were believed to have collided' though I'm not aware of anyone having witnessed the fact. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Claim on Bf.109 5th September 1940
Thanks a lot Peter!
The collision is given in BoB Then and Now Vol V and in Shores’ Aces High, both of which naturally because of space constrains doesn’t give more details. A. Robinson in his RAF Fighter Sqns in the BoB gives some details on the action but the collision is mentioned only as what Ryder believed to have happened.. I have some interests on Webster’s career thanks to BoB Then and Now Vol V, while reading it I got an opinion that he was one of those remarkable but little known, at least here in Finland, FC pilots. Thanks again Peter Your answer is much appreciated! Juha |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Claim on Bf.109 5th September 1940
Juha and Peter C -can I refer you both to http://brew.clients.ch/Hood41Sqdn2.htm; and http://brew.clients.ch/GrndDiaries41.htm, where I think you will learn something to your advantage, as they used to say.
best Chris Going |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Friendly fire WWII | Brian | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 803 | 8th July 2023 15:47 |
German claims and Allied losses May 1940 | Laurent Rizzotti | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 2 | 19th May 2010 11:13 |
Which Allied unit made the attack? | Mikael Olrog | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 8 | 31st January 2010 23:20 |
Fleet Air Arm claim 2nd September 1940 | Hans Nauta | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 7 | 23rd September 2006 14:46 |
Fighter pilots' guts | Hawk-Eye | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 44 | 8th April 2005 14:25 |