![]() |
|
|||||||
| Allied and Soviet Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the Air Forces of the Western Allies and the Soviet Union. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
American Fuel Won The Battle of Britain
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: American Fuel Won The Battle of Britain
I was under the impression that scientists at the Shell Lab at Stanlow, Cheshire devised high-octane fuel for RAF fighters.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: American Fuel Won The Battle of Britain
Whoever first was responsible for creating it I'm sure that long ago I read that 100 Octane fuel was sent to the UK in time for the Battle of Britain.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: American Fuel Won The Battle of Britain
And the USSR was supplying fuel to Germany, wasn't it? The wonders of international trade!
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: American Fuel Won The Battle of Britain
Coh! And there was me thinking it was mainly the pilots in the aircraft, the RAF tactics, radar, aircraft production, the RAF groundcrews, the WAAFs, the backroom boys, the civvies working on the Home Front etc etc that won the Battle of Britain...
![]() Breaking News from the US of A: Spitfires and Hurricanes were invented in America and all the pilots were Brad Pitt clones. Oh and America joined the war in 1939. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: American Fuel Won The Battle of Britain
Well, I am quite surprised I thought that Tom Cruise won the Battle of Britain .....
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: American Fuel Won The Battle of Britain
And to add to Bombphoon, Packard built the Merlin engine which powered the Spitfires and Hurricanes. When America joined in we sat back, drinking tea, and just let them get on with it, because they were so superior to us.
__________________
Peter Verney ex nav/rad |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: American Fuel Won The Battle of Britain
Quote:
UK Theatre 100 grade fuel consumption http://www.allaboutwarfare.com/forum...wtopic=230&hl= (you might have to register to view) from the thread: The procurement of 100-octane fuel for RAF use involved the use of several sources of supply, and was not contingent upon supply from the United States in isolation, as Table 2 indicates. Table2. 100 Octane fuel production: current production estimates exclusive of American domestic production, November 1940. From PRO AIR 19/254 - 23A Plant Production (tons per annum) Heysham, UK 150,000 Billingham, UK 15,000 Stanlow, UK 55,000 Abadan 50,000 Trinidad 80,000 Palembang, Dutch East Indies 50,000 Pladejoe, Dutch East Indies 50,000 Aruba, Dutch West Indies 50,000 |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: American Fuel Won The Battle of Britain
Hello
yes, British began built their own 100 oct production capacity before the war but also buy 100 oct from USA. But own production and diversion of sources were keys to RAF decision to began to switch to 100 oct from 87 oct. 100 oct fuel gave better performance only below full throttle height by allowing the use of higher boost. So to get most out of it one need engines with very effective superchargers. Juha |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: American Fuel Won The Battle of Britain
No thought for the tanker crews of all nations who got the fuel to the UK. If anything I thought the production of Liberty ships at the height of the U-Boot war might have been a one of many genuine US achievements to raise as it ensured this country survived..
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Need assistance: Role of the Luftwaffe/Germany in the Battle of Britain? | wh0whatwhere | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 59 | 28th January 2009 01:32 |
| Battle of Britain won date | Shikhov | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 15 | 23rd June 2008 16:41 |
| Publication news on new books on Battle of Britain & Barbarossa Air Battle | Christer Bergström | Books and Magazines | 4 | 8th August 2006 03:41 |
| Battle Of Britain Books | Jim Oxley | Books and Magazines | 3 | 13th March 2006 06:56 |
| Non-Operational Unit victories in the Battle of Britain | Larry | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 2 | 7th January 2005 00:05 |