![]() |
|
Allied and Soviet Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the Air Forces of the Western Allies and the Soviet Union. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Polish Mustang PK-E, 315 Sqd
Bergen,
I have not seen ORB online for 86 or 547 Squadrons (which is not to say they are not online, just that I have not found them). However, if you read the ORB links for the 315 squadron given by Peter S you can see that when CIUNDZIEWICKI was lost he was part of the two plane PATROL along the coast of Norway. It looks like there were four such two plane Patrols on that day, probably each along a different 20 mile stretch of coast, mainly, (I suspect) looking for activity to be reported back to Coastal Command. When the fighters were used to ESCORT strike forces (often Beaufighters) the description used is "ESCORT", see for example activity on 1944-11-15. I am beginning to think the statement about "Escorting Liberators" on 10 Nov may not be correct. There may have been Liberators flying that day, but perhaps on different missions, antisubmarine sweeps or the like. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Polish Mustang PK-E, 315 Sqd
Quote:
"2 Mustangs IIIs of this squadron took off on patrol off the coast of NORWAY (20 miles) according to plan to protect Coastal Command A.V. Patrol 7 LIBERATORS flying at 1000 ft, according to plan." |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Polish Mustang PK-E, 315 Sqd
Quote:
Further there would be of great interest to excact find out what the mission was. Were where those Liberators going, what mission or target did they have ? Any personal information about Antoni Ciundziewicki ? Number of sorties, victories etc Was he married ?, any living relatives ? Thanks again Bergen |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Polish Mustang PK-E, 315 Sqd
Hi Peter and other posters
I realise that this intervention may not be entirely helpful but it seems to me that it would be really helpful if somebody could find out which Liberator sqn was involved and what is the record of their operations for that day. I have been unsure about the events as recorded in 315Sqn ORB since the last time this incident appeared on one of the forums. On 10Nov44 315Sqn flew four overlapping patrols each of two a/c and taking off at 55/50 minute intervals. The first was 1140-1540; the second 1235-1625; the third 1325-1720 and the fourth 1415-1755. So, for whatever it is worth, the first patrol had not returned before the last patrol took off. It seems to me that it is likely that the Liberators were airborne for all of this period from 1140-1755. In the 315Sqn ORB all four reports describe the task, in different levels of detail, as "protect Coastal Command A.V. Patrol 7 LIBERATORS flying at 1000 ft". There are at least two things I don't understand. I am not well-versed in Coastal Command operations, but I don't think I have ever been aware of CC a/c apparently operating in such a large formation? It would have produced one hell of a radar response. Where I have looked at CC sqn ORBs then usually they record just single a/c operating on any patrol. If the (slower) Liberators were operating at such a low altitude and so close to the Norwegian coast why was there an escort of only two a/c when usually at least 8 and often 12 a/c would be put up to escort Beaufighters or Mosquitos? If JG5 has responded how would two a/c protect seven Liberators? Steve |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Polish Mustang PK-E, 315 Sqd
SteveB,
Good points. I was looking at the staggered takeoffs and wondering what that meant. I wonder if we are misreading some of the terms. I don't know what seven Liberators flying together at 1000 ft, 20 miles off the coast of Norway would be doing, but maybe a single Liberator equipped with ASV radar is searching for surface shipping. Maybe there was more than one Liberator, but each had a separate search/patrol area. Maybe they/it orbited in a set area over a period of hours, so the escort fighters would replace each other. I wonder if 1000 feet up and 20 miles off the coast is just the right altitude to be able to scan "up to the coast" but not get interference from the coast itself. Questions... Questions.... |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Polish Mustang PK-E, 315 Sqd
Quote:
Did the 86 or 547 Sqd´s ever conduct antisubmarine sorties ? Were they fittet with any Leighlights, depthcharges etc ? Bergen |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Polish Mustang PK-E, 315 Sqd
Quote:
Not a lot, I’m afraid. 794407 Born 15.11.1915. After Polish Campaign in Soviet captivity. Arrived in UK on 14.10.1941. 25(P)EFTS, 16(P)SFTS 11 AGS Sept.1943 sent to 61 OTU Jan 1944 posted to 315 “City of Deblin” Squadron 58 operational sorties (111 hours) ¾ V1 (1/2 + ¼) on 22.7.1944 Decorated with Cross of Valour with Bar I never came across his family. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Polish Mustang PK-E, 315 Sqd
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Polish Mustang PK-E, 315 Sqd
Quote:
What does 25(p) etc mean ? What was his victories ? |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Polish Mustang PK-E, 315 Sqd
Bergen,
Both 86 and 547 squadrons had been involved with antisubmarine operations before moving to Scotland where they both (according to the links below) continued such operations. http://www.historyofwar.org/air/units/RAF/86_wwII.html http://www.rafweb.org/Sqn541-598.htm Both squadrons were still sinking U-boats up to the end of the war, see the following two links. http://uboat.net/boats/u579.htm http://uboat.net/boats/u3523.htm |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
4th May 1945 - attack on U-155 | Faenor | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 14 | 20th April 2011 12:16 |
Polish Campaign of 1939 - some first hand battle accounts | Domen123 | The Second World War in General | 0 | 23rd December 2009 01:41 |
Small explanation to the Polish nationalists about Polish inter-war paradise! | Obst. Zerstorer | The Second World War in General | 2 | 21st September 2005 19:22 |
1th October 1938: Joint Polish-Nazi Germany aggression against Czechoslovakia | Obst. Zerstorer | The Second World War in General | 5 | 19th September 2005 22:11 |
Stuka in Aeroplane II/05. Nice Story and Plenty Errors! | Mirek Wawrzynski | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 11 | 27th January 2005 19:15 |