Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Allied and Soviet Air Forces

Allied and Soviet Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the Air Forces of the Western Allies and the Soviet Union.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 12th September 2013, 15:52
Graham Boak Graham Boak is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lancashire, UK
Posts: 1,682
Graham Boak is on a distinguished road
Re: Aircraft I/D required (redux)

Yes, I do. Also Putnam's Tupolev Aircraft, and Gordon's book on Russian WW2 bombers. No tailplanes with dihedral on Tu2s. At some risk of straying, I'd point out that all of the Russian twin-fin designs operated by the VVS in WW2 appear to have had dihedral tailplanes, a design feature that possibly is as "standardised" as their overall configuration and wing planforms.

I should add that the thread mentioned above brought out details that are not covered in any of the texts above, although not relevant to this discussion.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 22nd September 2013, 05:00
bearoutwest bearoutwest is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 401
bearoutwest is on a distinguished road
Re: Aircraft I/D required (redux)

The Bulgarian Air Force used a number of Dornier Do17M (and possibly K) aircraft. A number of decal makers have produced colour schemes with the (what I call) splinter camouflage pattern - see link below.

http://img.1001modelkits.com/22740-1...ecals-7247.jpg

If we ignore the actual squadron/aircraft codes of the example in the decal web-page, and look at the distinctive pattern of the wing, and the characteristic light coloured rear fuselage sides. Does this fit the pattern on Denes' photo?

Regards,
...geoff
__________________
- converting fuel into noise.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 20th October 2013, 18:16
Dénes Bernád Dénes Bernád is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hungary
Posts: 1,878
Dénes Bernád will become famous soon enough
Re: Aircraft I/D required (redux)

Finally, I managed to make a decent scan. Hope it helps:

__________________
Dénes
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 21st October 2013, 14:09
edNorth edNorth is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,127
edNorth is on a distinguished road
Re: Aircraft I/D required (redux)

The code 4N+ suggests Luftwaffe Do 17, and remains of radial engine cowlings,
and remains of (modified?) pre-war scheme.
All three staffeln of (F)/22 flew against France,
using the Do 17 P or M (or mixture of them in 3. Sptaffeln).
Fairly certain this is in wrong section of TOCH! (this is Luftwaffe).
-ed

Last edited by edNorth; 21st October 2013 at 19:27. Reason: changed opinion
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 21st October 2013, 20:06
Larry Larry is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Middlesex, England
Posts: 1,028
Larry is on a distinguished road
Re: Aircraft I/D required (redux)

But didn't it start out as a French aircraft
__________________
Larry Hayward

Last edited by Larry; 21st October 2013 at 23:45.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 22nd October 2013, 00:44
edNorth edNorth is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,127
edNorth is on a distinguished road
Re: Aircraft I/D required (redux)

nah, already suggested this is Do 17 in post #8.
Else there are too many cooks stirring the pot :-)

I am still fairly certain this is Do 17 from (F)/22, code 4N+
the 4 and the N are plainly visible, the N being slightly charred by fire.
Anyways when this photo was taken is summertime, likely long time since it was downed, and that likely expaints the stripped and looted appearance. I bet there lurks another picture(s) of it out there. Photo collectors lease look in your files marked Luftwaffe, 1939/1940, Do 17, (F)/22 ... etc.

I also remember Do 17 camo with Light Blue extending upwards on fuselage, then whats so radical with suggesting lighter patces be parts of pre war colour RLM 02 ?????
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 23rd October 2013, 02:36
waroff waroff is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 63
waroff is on a distinguished road
Re: Aircraft I/D required (redux)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dénes Bernád View Post

from the beginning I still say it is a Do 17, watching the details of the tail. This scan removes any doubt
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 23rd October 2013, 07:41
ClinA-78 ClinA-78 is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,014
ClinA-78 is on a distinguished road
Re: Aircraft I/D required (redux)

Yes, still and ever a Do 17.
Watch the circular engine bearer/mounting between the men at left.
Moreover German soldiers look more or less hopeless!

ClinA-78
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
losses jagdwaffe September 6th 1943 in the West kris99 Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 2 3rd January 2013 09:46
VIIIUSAAF and BC failures at the Wesel bridges. tcolvin Allied and Soviet Air Forces 15 16th March 2010 13:59
About WW2 fighter aircraft firing power Rob Philips Allied and Soviet Air Forces 61 7th October 2008 03:49
Links Relating To Aircraft Incidents RossGmann General 0 25th April 2008 14:07
Airpower summary Pilot Post-WW2 Military and Naval Aviation 0 23rd February 2007 15:11


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 18:17.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net