Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces

Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 23rd February 2006, 13:14
klaymann klaymann is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 12
klaymann is on a distinguished road
rotterdam records

Are there any files/info from the rotterdam period of the blitzkreig that include the luftwaffe (esp the reccon units) .. my opa ( 3.(f)10 )was shot down ( survived) taken photo's of AA installations(ironically) over the bridges around rotterdam.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 23rd February 2006, 17:26
Jaap Woortman's Avatar
Jaap Woortman Jaap Woortman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 542
Jaap Woortman is on a distinguished road
Re: rotterdam records

Dear Klaymann,

The Studygroep Airwar 1939-1945 is compiling a 'Losslist Netherlands Sept. 3rd, 1939 - May 8th, 1945' including the Rotterdam area. But a plane from 3.(F)10 is not included. But we also have some 'missing links' concerning Do 17s. I assume the unit was flying with Do 17s? Please could you give some more data?

Jaap Woortman
Secr. Studygroup Airwar 1939-1945.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 25th February 2006, 07:14
klaymann klaymann is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 12
klaymann is on a distinguished road
Re: rotterdam records

To Jaap

Yes he was flying Do 17p ...I have seen his unit "tannenberg" as 3.(f)10 and been advised it could be 3.(h)10 what is the difference of (f) and (h) ?

The story he told was that their unit was assigned to take reccon pics of the AA around the bridges .. several planes had flown off before but never returned so he was called up to do a mission .. over the area the main camera malfunctioned so they had to come in low with a crewman taking photos out of the cockpit .. they took massive damage ( engine fire , crewman dead ) and described the plane looking like a sieve .. they managed to get clear and bail out and eventually return to their unit with the photos only to be told that after they didn't return another plane took off and got really good photos.

So going by his oral memory of the action , there must be several "lost" Do 17 around that time/area

I also found out that our family name has several versions !? .. so he could be Kurt Gustav Kwidor/jeidu/jedow?

hope this helps.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 25th February 2006, 11:49
Jaap Woortman's Avatar
Jaap Woortman Jaap Woortman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 542
Jaap Woortman is on a distinguished road
Re: rotterdam records

Thanks for the information.
(F) means Fernaufklärung and (H) means Heeresaufklärung.
Indeed several planes of Aufklärungsunits have been shot down over the Rotterdam area. But also in areas between de Dutch-German border and the Rotterdam area. Have you any idea about the day?
The recce units have not only been flying with Do 17s. We have crashes from Ju 88s, Do 215s and He 111s of (F) recce units.

Jaap
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 25th February 2006, 12:03
Laurent Rizzotti Laurent Rizzotti is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 2,932
Laurent Rizzotti will become famous soon enough
Re: rotterdam records

To summarize the difference between (F) and (H) recon units, the (F) did long-range recon (as their name said, Fern = away in German) and the (H) did tactical recon around the frontline for the army.

At least that was what they were designef for, real use may have changed.

Also in 1940 (H) units were usually under command of Army units (for example a (H) Staffel was attached to each Panzerdivision) while (F) units remained under Luftwaffe command.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 25th February 2006, 14:33
Jaap Woortman's Avatar
Jaap Woortman Jaap Woortman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 542
Jaap Woortman is on a distinguished road
Re: rotterdam records

I have checked some publications and files and found the following Order of Battle of May 9th, 1940 for the Aufkl. Gruppe 10 of the Luftwaffe for the operations against the Netherlands.

Heeresgruppe B
a. 6.Armee
3.(F)/10 at Oberbruch-Süd with Do 17P/M. Reg. T1

b. 18.Armee
Koluft: Stab AufklGr.10

X.Armeekorps
1.(H)/10 at Coesfeld with 9/8 Hs 126B. Reg. T1

XXVI.Armeekorps
2.(H)/10 near Euskirchen with 9/0 Hs 126B. Reg. T1

Oberbruch is near Heinsberg in Nordrhein-Westfalen(Germany)

Jaap
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 26th February 2006, 13:24
klaymann klaymann is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 12
klaymann is on a distinguished road
Re: rotterdam records

To all .. Danke

Well the (F) would match with him based in narvik doing reccon over england during B.O.B period..

Sorry Jaap ,I don't have a date of the action , this was all orally recounted after me pestering him all the time about what he went thru.

p.s..."Oberbruch is near Heinsberg in Nordrhein-Westfalen(Germany)" ... how far from the front/border is this place? .( sorry , I'm in New Zealand).

p.s.s.. This part seems easier to work with compared to me trying to find the fighter unit ( bf109 .. east front) that he was transfered to after main B.O.B period ended....

Klay.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 26th February 2006, 16:31
Jaap Woortman's Avatar
Jaap Woortman Jaap Woortman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 542
Jaap Woortman is on a distinguished road
Re: rotterdam records

Dear Klaymann,

Oberbruch was 150 km, about 100 miles, from Rotterdam.
Strange is that 6.Armee, 3.(F)/10 was supporting this unit, was operating in northern Belgium and that 18.Armee was responsable for the operation in the Netherlands. Rotterdam is a big harbour in the Netherlands. So a unit for the Belgium theatre was operating in the Dutch battle area. I know that the Luftwaffe was flexible, but so flexible? Was it possible that 3.(F)/10 has been operating over Antwerp and that Rotterdam and Antwerp have been mixed-up?

Jaap
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 26th February 2006, 22:21
Pieter H Pieter H is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 297
Pieter H is on a distinguished road
Re: rotterdam records

All,
Jaap is correct in that there are no records of (F)/10 activities or flights over Holland in May 1940.
However, maybe the following can bring some more clarity into this matter:
Most (all?) Do-17 or Do-215 long distance reccon planes shot down over Holland in these days belonged to either the Auflklaerungs-Staffel Oberkommando der Luftwaffe (or I.(F)/A.St.O.d.L, code T5) or the Aufklaerungs-Staffel of Flieger Division 7. (A.St. Fl.Div.7, code 4Q). However, one of the Do-17Z or Do-215 planes of the latter unit that was shot down close to Dordrecht (some 20 km south of Rotterdam) clearly had the Tannenberg emblem on the nose, which has always wondered me. But the code of 4Q+KH clearly linked it to A.St.Fl.Div.7.
It now seems plausible that at least a number of planes of (F)/10 had been detached to this unit, which had been formed specially to cover all transport units and the 22.Luftlande Division that were taking part in the airborne operations at The Hague and Rotterdam.

From the description it seems that the flight you refer to took place later on the day, after some of the earlier flights were shot down at Dordrecht and Woerden. However, I have no indication of its crash site.

Pieter
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 27th February 2006, 11:28
klaymann klaymann is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 12
klaymann is on a distinguished road
Re: rotterdam records

All,
You guys a really cool to have provided all this info ... when I refer to the Do-17p that Opa flew with 3.(f)10 it's based on a photo in (poland 1939).
Unfortunatly he was not pacific on the dornier models he flew with the tannenberg unit thru the west/north areas of battle.

P.S. Jaap , I do remember the area as Rotterdam as after hearing it , all I could think of was "rotten rams(sheep)" ... sounds creepy but thats how it stuck in my head .. this is after all 12 yrs ago...

P.P.S .. Pieter .. is there a photo/link of the "Tannenberg" Dornier wreckage you mentioned ?

Klay.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
German claims and Allied losses May 1940 Laurent Rizzotti Allied and Soviet Air Forces 2 19th May 2010 11:13
Detailed loss records 1944 Andreas Brekken Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 7 20th November 2005 20:16
Need help with NJG 100 records for early 1945 Sergio Luis dos Santos Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 1 7th September 2005 22:32
Definitely Off-Beat: Guineas Book of World Records Rabe Anton Books and Magazines 6 2nd June 2005 17:24
Japanese Loss Records - Fact Or Myth?? Jim Oxley Japanese and Allied Air Forces in the Far East 5 9th April 2005 21:38


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 19:57.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net