Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Allied and Soviet Air Forces

Allied and Soviet Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the Air Forces of the Western Allies and the Soviet Union.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 6th November 2015, 14:52
Dénes Bernád Dénes Bernád is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hungary
Posts: 1,889
Dénes Bernád will become famous soon enough
Re: Soviet claims, 16 June 1943

Thanks, Andrey, for the details.

The Hungarians observed six fighters - which they identified as Airacobras - taking off from Urasovo airfield to intercept the Ju 88 & Bf 109 formation. Perhaps this detail helps identifying the VVS unit.
__________________
Dénes
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 6th November 2015, 16:29
Andrey Kuznetsov Andrey Kuznetsov is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 931
Andrey Kuznetsov will become famous soon enough
Re: Soviet claims, 16 June 1943

Hello Dénes,

Urasovo was a base for 573.IAP PVO (310.IAD). At that moment it had several Yak-1/Yak-7b and 2 Hurricanes ready for action, if remember right (I'll check it later today). Also 4 Yak-9 attached to 573.IAO from 802.IAP PVO.

Which documents of Hungarian AF have survived the war? War diaries, reports, claims/losses lists?

Best regards,
Andrey
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 6th November 2015, 17:05
Dénes Bernád Dénes Bernád is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hungary
Posts: 1,889
Dénes Bernád will become famous soon enough
Re: Soviet claims, 16 June 1943

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrey Kuznetsov View Post
Which documents of Hungarian AF have survived the war? War diaries, reports, claims/losses lists?
Very-very few documents related to the Hungarian air force (and not only) survived the war and the following 'purges'. It is estimated that about 95% of the documents were lost. Therefore, it's very hard (if not impossible) nowadays to piece together the wartime events.
__________________
Dénes
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 6th November 2015, 21:10
Andrey Kuznetsov Andrey Kuznetsov is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 931
Andrey Kuznetsov will become famous soon enough
Re: Soviet claims, 16 June 1943

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dénes Bernád View Post
Very-very few documents related to the Hungarian air force (and not only) survived the war and the following 'purges'. It is estimated that about 95% of the documents were lost.
So the situation like with Luftwaffe. It is regrettably
I had a hope to update the loss account of Lfl.4 during Apr.-Jun.43 by Hungarian AF losses for the full understanding of the situation.
Unfortunately GQM returns for the timeframe in question hasn't Hungarian AF entries.

Returning to 16.Jun.43: on Urasov airfield were ready for action 1 Yak-1, 7 Yak-7b, 2 Hurricanes of 573.IAP and 4 Yak-9 attached from 802.IAP.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dénes Bernád View Post
The Hungarians observed six fighters - which they identified as Airacobras - taking off from Urasovo airfield to intercept the Ju 88 & Bf 109 formation.
According to operative report of 310.IAD, 7 fighters took off for intercept. Maybe all of them were Yaks. Their sole claim was Toth's Bf109F. How many Ju88s and Bf109s took part in the mission?

Best regards,
Andrey
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 6th November 2015, 21:25
Dénes Bernád Dénes Bernád is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hungary
Posts: 1,889
Dénes Bernád will become famous soon enough
Re: Soviet claims, 16 June 1943

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrey Kuznetsov View Post
So the situation like with Luftwaffe. It is regrettably
Actually, it's worse. We still have a sizeable chunk of data regarding the Luftwaffe, but nothing similar about the Hungarian air force.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrey Kuznetsov View Post
How many Ju88s and Bf109s took part in the mission?
As far as I know, three Ju 88s left the base to find and attack the Soviet train; however, one bomber returned early due to engine trouble. They were escorted by four '109s.
__________________
Dénes
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 6th November 2015, 21:51
Andrey Kuznetsov Andrey Kuznetsov is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 931
Andrey Kuznetsov will become famous soon enough
Re: Soviet claims, 16 June 1943

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dénes Bernád View Post
Actually, it's worse.


So Rumanian AF situation with documents seems a lucky exception in comparison with Germany and Hungary.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dénes Bernád View Post
As far as I know, three Ju 88s left the base to find and attack the Soviet train; however, one bomber returned early due to engine trouble. They were escorted by four '109s.
Thank you! So Toth's words about 2 Ju88 are true. That is why so strange quantity instead of Kette.

I'll pay more attention to data about POW Hungarian pilots. It is a specific source but if the normal sources almost completely disappeared ...

Best regards,
Andrey
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Klaus Scheer and Helmut Dahms of NJG 100 markr Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 10 20th February 2021 14:06
Mediterranean : Allied night fighter claims, August 1943 Antonio_M Allied and Soviet Air Forces 5 2nd November 2015 20:58
Dogfights over Sworbe 18-23.Nov.1944 questions. Part 1. German claims vs Soviet losses Andrey Kuznetsov Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 4 3rd February 2012 18:40
VVS operations 6-8 may & 8-10 june 1943, claims and losses. Evgeny Velichko Allied and Soviet Air Forces 78 18th August 2009 15:16
Soviet pilots' claims against 'P.24' Dénes Bernád Allied and Soviet Air Forces 13 22nd May 2005 16:51


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 11:24.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net