Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Allied and Soviet Air Forces

Allied and Soviet Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the Air Forces of the Western Allies and the Soviet Union.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 7th April 2011, 14:33
Graham Boak Graham Boak is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lancashire, UK
Posts: 1,688
Graham Boak is on a distinguished road
Re: All metal Mosquito ??

I stand by my comments: given that metal replaced wood in all but a very small handful of designs, including ones originally designed in wood, the matter seems clear. Given that no-one will ever spend an equivalent amount of effort designing a metal version of the Mosquito, the point is probably unprovable.

It is not true that DH had trouble selling the Mosquito to the RAF: it was supported throughout its design, development and production phases. Do you seriously think an unapproved aircraft would have been allowed such a diversion of design effort and two precious Merlins? No doubt there were elements in the RAF that thought it the wrong choice, but the same comment can probably be made about every aircraft the service has ever had (including the Spitfire). The RAF, with the associated Ministries and Establishments, cannot be expected to speak with a single voice on such complex matters. Any manufacturer may understandably consider that (at certain times) it failed to get all the support it wanted - that's not the same as being unsupported at all.

A quick look gives me a max. speed for the Spitfire Mk.V of 374mph at 13.000ft. and the Mosquito B Mk.IV at 380mph at 17000ft. It is important to quote not just the top speed, but the altitude for which it is quoted. 6 mph is probably the penalty for the Spitfire's flat armoured windscreen as opposed to the Mosquito's V-screen, but is little more than the variation from one aircraft to another off the production lines. The Mk.V Spit had been in service a year before the Mosquito reached the squadrons, and the Mosquito was of course flying against the Fw190, which could reach over 400mph at similar altitudes.

Which might help to explain why the Mosquito day bomber loss rate was higher than that of the Blenheim it replaced, and why it was removed from service as an unarmed unescorted day bomber after use by only two squadrons. The pure bomber never did return - the fighter-bomber variant did, but served as a conventional light bomber under fighter escort, and only after the threat from the Luftwaffe had been considerably reduced.

The Mosquito was a wonderful design, with many fine features and a great service career. However, many of the stories are propaganda myths - particularly for the bombers - and a more measured judgement is needed. It couldn't "walk on water".
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
V1 flying bombs shot down by the 68 Sqn 68 Sqn Allied and Soviet Air Forces 10 11th February 2011 19:23
Mosquito Loss - 25 January 1945 Andy Saunders Allied and Soviet Air Forces 3 19th March 2008 14:50
'Roasted' Mosquito pictures BC Allied and Soviet Air Forces 0 24th December 2007 22:28
Mosquito downed by Me163 Norman Malayney Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 6 14th August 2007 04:22


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 10:05.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net