Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Off Topic

Off Topic Please use this forum to discuss all off topic subjects.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 8th April 2011, 08:28
Six Nifty .50s Six Nifty .50s is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 246
Six Nifty .50s
Re: Massive cut backs in Dutch Defense!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruy Horta View Post
The current dutch conservative government is about to present the most radical defense cut back since the late twenties early thirties, proofing that politicians don't learn from history.

With the end of the cold war it is obvious that a force reduction was in place, but there comes a point where continued cut backs will degrade your ability to conduct combined arms operations.

Just one example. Our government is planning to remove all tanks (Leopard II) from its inventory. Just imagine an army with no armored force...it borders on the incredulous. With memories of our little armored cars in 1940 opposing the Wehrmacht one should think that no self respecting army general could accept having no tanks (no matter how many Apaches - and we have only a few - or anti tank capable AFV you've got - a MBT is a force of its own).

I don't have a blog, but I just have to vent my frustration in some way or another and this off topic sub forum will have to do.

The irony of it is that in the Netherlands it is the conservative right that seems to do the biggest defense cut backs, but it is the left that gets the blame when the shit hits the fan for being "pacifist".

Well I hope the generals remember who stabbed them in the backs.

An army without tanks....might as well pack the whole thing in and start a people's militia.

Madness...

I have the same sentiments about the decline of U.S. naval aviation, and I do refer to quality of equipment, not quantity. (Thanks to conservative politicians more than liberals). But, what are the realistic long term potential threats to your national security, other than terrorism and economic instability?

Main Battle Tanks are still useful in U.S. service but I don't think that we need to keep most of them. They are big, heavy, expensive to transport and supply overseas, and except for two short periods in the Middle East during 1991 and 2003, tanks have given us little return on a huge investment ever since the breakup of the Soviet Union.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New book release - Dutch airfields in wartime Wybe Buising Books and Magazines 7 8th January 2010 18:17
the raid to Lanveoc Poulmic/ Brest 25th Oct 1943. Dutch 320. everard Allied and Soviet Air Forces 0 15th March 2005 15:51


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 20:24.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net