Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Japanese and Allied Air Forces in the Far East

Japanese and Allied Air Forces in the Far East Please use this forum to discuss the Air War in the Far East.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #30  
Old 6th July 2006, 22:01
rldunn rldunn is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 83
rldunn is on a distinguished road
Re: Australian Spitfires

While the monograph previously mentioned is certainly the most convenient and comprehensive list of Japanese losses over Australia, it is far from the only authoritative source. Other sources include intercepted Japanese radio messages (one of these gives a comprehensive report of month by month losses, by a/c type, in the Japanese 13th Air Fleet), POW interrogation reports, and captured documents. Another important source of evidence are the wrecks of Japanese a/c shot down (in particular the paucity of the same) over Australia.

With regard to Japanese propaganda, it really doesn't seem that terribly different than Allied practice. They overclaimed wildly on many occasions and their official communiques reported these claims as fact. They sometimes delayed announcing major shipping losses and in a few cases tried to completely obscure defeats such as the Battle of Midway. They routinely announced aircraft losses of which they thought the enemy had knowledge, i.e., those lost over enemy territory. They did not routinely announce a/c crash landing at base or in friendly territory though they might mention them as damaged. I believe this is basically similar to US and British practice. You can best understand Japanese propaganda by reading their official communiques. They did have some peculiarities. Many aircraft weren't merely shot down but "crash dived into an enemy objective." Aside from such stylistic differences their communiques were about as reliable as Allied communiques.

Obviously it is important to have access to records but also to understand how they were created and used. Official communiques were summaries based on a headquarters report to Tokyo. Kodochoshos were the fighting unit's own record of action. Action summaries were also prepared by headquarters for internal military use, other reports were prepared for logistics and replacement purposes. Examples of all these type reports exist. In short, while difficult, it is quite possible to determine relevant losses with considerable accuracy.

One wonders how many fuel starved Spitfires had a bullet hole in a fuel line or fuel tank.

RLD
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Spitfires captured or crashed on the continent 1940 Larry Hickey Allied and Soviet Air Forces 20 24th April 2010 22:40
Natural metal Spitfires. stefaan Allied and Soviet Air Forces 24 3rd September 2005 20:33
Israeli Ezer Weizman Nonny Allied and Soviet Air Forces 6 28th April 2005 04:34
Discussion on the air war in Tunisia Christer Bergström Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 14 1st April 2005 19:47
Tunisian losses Juha Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 29 25th March 2005 14:56


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 17:15.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net