Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces

Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 20th August 2006, 13:00
Kurfürst Kurfürst is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 169
Kurfürst
Re: Bf 109E rate of roll

Here's a more complete version from niklas's site,showing stick forces as well, it's not quite even playing field.. I wonder if anyone



There are some comments of 109E roll rate in the August 1940 Luftwaffe tactical comparison on my site : http://www.kurfurst.bravehost.com/


I've seen an article on a recently restored 109E test flight, the pilot said the ailerons were very impressive, and he compared them to the spit w metal ailerons, but 50% higher roll rate, but nothing more specific. I suppose because of the square wingtips of the 109E..?

Speaking of clipping, I always wondered about that clipped/Unclipped Spit roll rate graph. It seems to originate to RAE, but the trouble with it is that half a dozon reports I have on the same things is just showing it's something alien.

I have ww2 pilot queries, in which they were asked wheter they could compete the 190 in roll - the vast majority said not a chance, ask back for normal wings. I have pilots on restored warbirds, they say the metal ailrons were pretty much the same as the 109s (ie. 80-90 degrees peak), and the clipped at 3 secs for a 360 degree roll. The NACA tests specifically says they can't obtain full deflection over 140 mph ias with 40 lbs, and RAE in comparison with the Mustang notes 45 deg/sec roll rate at 400 mph ias would require 72 lbs stick force on the Spit.

Then there's the British tests on wheter clipping worths it or not, and they say...


Finally here's some timed roll rate tests on two spit 12s, one was considered having 'poor' ailerons, the other good ones, decribed in the rest of the report. Linked via M williams site : http://www.spitfireperformance.com/mk12roll.gif It agrees well with the findings of RAE posted above.

Compare with the trend on NACA roll chart posted. It just don't agree at all, and I wonder why is this, I tend to b inclined that this is probably showing some MkV experimental aileron type testing, there were quite a few such tests in 1943. Does anyone have a detailed report that the NACA roll chart is originated from?
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FW190a-3 /A4 AGr123 in France 1943 1944. Eric Larger Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 16 12th June 2011 10:29
Documentation of 2000HP Bf 109s of 1945 Kurfürst Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 5 10th September 2009 13:15
Me 109F development Franek Grabowski Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 39 5th July 2008 22:48
Data Plates Exposed #4: Bf 109E stephen f. polyak Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 5 26th March 2008 15:27
A strange Bf 109E... Grzesio Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 31 4th February 2005 02:18


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 14:59.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net