Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick Beale
If you propose to sit on the correct information for an indefinite period, the least you can do is accept that people wil use what is actually available to them in the meantime.
|
Progress is good. No worries.
Suppose if you ask and get correct Ju 88 info but choose ignore and
and re-use 1960s William Green instead. That would probably ruin
the authors reputation, if publicly known, right?
So I strongly disagree. Do not write same sh..* over and over, please.
So far have I answered all queries asked, so not "sitting on" correct info (sic) but just my research resaults. Not commenting if not certain or if my answers can be exploited by scrupilous people throwing 700 Euros after blurry photo, and then ask for info, but not showin what they got in first place. So you get nothing for nothing.
ed